Adrian Wyllie Excluded From Debate

Adrian Wyllie, Libertarian candidate for Governor of Florida will be excluded from the televised Gubernatorial debate to be held Wednesday 15 October, at 7 PM (Eastern time), at Broward College.  The debate will be televised on CBS channels.

On 14 October a Federal judge ordered that the debate organizers had no compelling need under the First Amendment to allow Wyllie to participate in the debates even though the organizers are not-for-profit organizations and the debate will be supported by State of Florida supported Broward College.

Although the latest Optimus Poll has Wyllie at 13% of the electorate vote and climbing, the sponsors of the debate do not consider him worthy to participate in this important public event.  In 2006 it took only 7% of the vote to be included in such debates.  Adrian Wyllie has blown through that limit, so it was pegged at 15%.  Next time a libertarian runs I bet it will be pegged at 30%.

You are the ones that lose in this rigged game.  You don’t get to see anything but the same old solutions presented by the same old faces proposing to bribe you with your own tax dollars in the same old way.  Things get worse, but your betters have decided you are not to know about all your choices.

 Of the two sponsors of the debate, Leadership Florida and the Florida Press Association, the FPA has already shown its prejudice to the Libertarian candidate when they hosted a forum to “educate the public” about the election but included only Republican and Democrat contenders.  That is when Adrian had 9% of the vote. The FPA is the trade organization of all print media in Florida, remember that they don’t just want to report the news, they want to control the news to their own satisfaction.

Write your local station or newspaper and tell them the time has come to an end for their mendacious control of events.  They need to report the news and not participate in filtering out viable opposition because they feel like it.

As career newspaper people, don’t they have any shame?

Why We Can’t Have Good Government

July 18, 2014 at 10:54am

by Jo Ann Vaccarino      Facebook/LibertarianChicks

No matter how often voters say they want to replace the corrupt politicians running their local, state and federal governments, they will rarely follow through because they will be tricked into voting them back in.  There are many ways the voters can be fooled; not the least of which is – by killing the viable candidates.  It’s so easy you won’t believe it.

Here are step by step instructions for How to Kill a Viable Candidate…Exclusions are going to be your primary tool.  You can use them to inflict ICS (Invisible Candidate Syndrome) on an unsuspecting newbie.

1.     You can hire the government to help. 

You hire your county’s Supervisor of Elections to set up a mock election and invite the public.  The SOE will print up the ballots for you and bring their polling stations and equipment to your local community center or church so your mock election looks just like the real thing. The only difference is – YOU get to choose which candidate’s names are printed on the ballots and which are not!  When you announce your mock election results, you create the fallacy that ONLY those candidates you included on your ballot are viable.   Since this is all put on by the official government election agency, the voters will naturally assume that your ballot is the same as the one they’ll see on Election Day.   Very few voters will ever seek the truth and find out that the candidate(s) you excluded actually submitted thousands of petitions or paid thousands of dollars (just like the candidates you favored) in order to qualify to appear on the real ballots in the real election.  When the real election comes, the invisible candidates’ names won’t look the least bit familiar to the voters and th IC’s should receive very few votes.

2.     You can use popular polls.

This works a lot like the mock election described above.  You hire a professional agency to create surveys that only include some of the candidates’ names; they follow the standard “scientific method” and then publish the results.  The voters will believe that only the candidates in your polls are viable.  The favored candidates you included will get a score from the poll.  The voters will become more familiar with your favored candidates each time you survey and publish the results.  The invisible candidate you excluded will obviously get no score.  No score equals no popularity.  And, the more often you poll with their name excluded, the worse off that candidate becomes.  (Don’t worry; no one will ever catch on to this game.)

3.     You can use the media.

Now that you’ve rigged the survey game, the media will naturally follow your lead.  They will not give any coverage to the candidate(s) you excluded because they have no popularity score.  In fact, they will likely produce some polls just like yours that continue to exclude the same candidate(s) you did.

4.     You can enjoy the natural effects of exclusion and diminished viability like:

a)     Reduced ability to fundraise.  Once you’ve diminished viability of a candidate via the above exclusionary tactics, the candidate will find it hideously difficult to fundraise.  Who’s going to donate to a candidate who isn’t even polling at ANY percent?  That lack of fundraising will help perpetuate the fallacy that the candidate is not viable, virtually eliminating any access they might have to media, making it nearly impossible for them to compete.

b)     Inability to reach campaign finance thresholds.  Many higher office elections give access to campaign fund matching, but the thresholds are usually set high enough to keep an invisible candidate with fundraising challenges from reaching them.

c)      Exclusion from voter guides.  Organizations that create voter guides often include only the most popular candidates.  If your victim has been out of the contest for a while; even the League of Women Voters won’t take notice.

d)     Candidates with no popularity scores get excluded from debates.  Debates have “criteria” candidates must meet in order to be included.  Popularity poll scores are one of the most common criteria.  The Debate organizers will choose a percent that candidates must have achieved in order to participate in the debate.  Of course, the invisible candidate hasn’t been included in the polls, so s/he has no score and thus does not qualify to be included in the debate.  Any candidate who doesn’t participate in the debates is automatically disqualified in the voters’ minds.

5.     Other election factors that will help kill a candidate:

a)     The 2-party fallacy.  If your candidate is running in a minor party, it makes it very easy to exclude that candidate from just about anything.  Not a Republican?  Not a Democrat?  Not a factor.    If you used all the exclusionary tactics above, you helped perpetuate this fallacy for future generations.

b)     Gerrymandered districts.  Chances are good, the two parties have already made an agreement about which way your district is going to swing.  In fact, the reason your district outline looks like a snake that swallowed a TV antennae is because they had to finagle it a bit to make sure the agreement would work out.  They know which party is most likely to win your district.  It will take a miracle to change that.

That covers most of the bases.  As you can see, you only have to jump in at the beginning and make sure the candidate is excluded from mock elections and surveys until the media is clearly ignoring that candidate.   After that, your project will snowball into the monster you hoped for.  The voters’ impression of the invisible candidate’s viability will be diminished to the point of no return.  No one will realize that the invisible candidate was viable all along; it was only the exclusion from all the “tests of viability” that made the IC appear to be a non-factor.

This election, instead of looking at the candidates presented to me on the silver platter, I’m going to go out of my way to seek the IC (invisible candidate).  In fact, I might even vote for the candidate who raised the least amount of money in each race – because I know, chances are really good that candidate is the real deal. Think about it:  why would anyone spend millions of dollars to get a job that pays less than a few hundred thousand per year?  I think those candidates must be mentally unstable.

If you do your job as a voter, then we can have good government. 

And, remember:  if your vote is your voice, then there is no such thing as a wasted vote.